Outsourced Medical Billing must pursue underpayments

By Carl Mays II

Any strong medical billing process and medical billing company must compare insurance payments to your contractual allowables and aggressively pursue underpayments. If this is not happening then most likely 5 to 10% of your practice's revenue is being lost.

Any medical billing process must include features that are specifically designed to counteract the actions taken by payers to withhold money from medical practices and facilities. Examples of these features include: comparing claims to payers adjudication rules before submission, calling on submitted claims that have not been denied or paid, posting all payment information - including denials, pursuing underpayments, and using predictive payment estimates in the patient collection process.

This article focuses on just one of the key elements you need from your medical billing service: pursuit of underpayments. Pursuit of underpayments starts with a critical step: comparison of EOBs to your contractual allowables (the payment your payers have agreed to make for each CPT code). You cannot count on payment posters to catch underpayments with their naked eye; the comparison must be automated and systematic. It goes without saying that if you do billing in-house the comparison still should be done.

Payers have adopted underpayment techniques that are too difficult for a payment poster to spot on their own. Medical billing companies can design their process to battle payers underpayment techniques because they have an advantage over individual practices - they see EOBs for a given payer across multiple practices and multiple states. The enhanced scope allows medical billing companies that pay attention to identify patterns that might be overlooked by individual medical practices.

A disturbing pattern that can regularly be seen by a medical billing company that is paying attention is one where a payer will select a set of procedures and underpay this set of procedures across a large number of providers (often by the same amount). This will continue for about 30 days and then the payer will resume paying the procedures at the correct amount and begin underpaying a whole new selection of procedures.

Although the amount of the underpayments may be small ($5 to $15), the totals can be quite large: upwards of a 10 percent net reduction in the payments the payer sends the practice. Despite the magnitude of the total, the constant hopping from CPT to CPT for underpayments and the relatively small amount of the underpayment on any individual claim makes the loss of revenue hard to spot - let alone pursue.

The pattern outlined above is why it is critical that a strategy for pursuing underpayments is not based upon payment posters picking up on the underpayments. Most payment posters will notice a large underpayment, but it is too much to expect them to spot a $5 underpayment.

This single action (comparison of payments to allowables) can increase a medical practice's collections by 5 to 10 percent. This is why you need to insure this critical step is being completed by your medical billing service.

Spotting the underpayment is only part of the battle, of course, the billing service also needs to have a systemic process in place for pursuing the underpayments. It is critical to pursue event the small underpayment amounts. Once a payer sees that their resources are being tied up readjudicating claims because of a $5.00 underpayment, the underpayments will often cease to happen.

Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II

About the Author:

Carl Mays II, CEO of ClaimCare Medical Billing Services, has spent over 14 years enhancing the operations of his clients. To read more about selecting Medical Insurance Billing Services subscribe to Carl's blog



Ten years and counting | Happy BirthDay Google | What would you ask Senators McCain and Obama? | Announcing the Android 1.0 SDK, release 1

Add to: File Insurance Business article Teen Photo Images